The Knicks Have Handled Stephon Like Bush Handled Iraq

I wouldn't be surprised if these two went out celebrating tonight. And won the lottery in the process.
So after all of that, the Knicks reach a buyout with Stephon on February 24th?
Are you kidding me? You're joking, right?
All that acrimony and drama, all those meetings and sessions and jabs, all of it for...what?
WHAT WAS THE POINT OF EVERYTHING? WHAT WAS THE POINT? THERE NEEDS TO BE A POINT!
*breathes deeply*
Let me get this straight: In April, Donnie Walsh fired Isiah Thomas ("fired" meaning "sent to an office somewhere"). In May, Donnie Walsh hired Mike D'Antoni. In July, Donnie Walsh signed Chris Duhon to serve as the starting point guard. This confirmed what everyone knew: the team was going in a new direction, and Stephon was on the way out. Only, there was never a way out. Instead, there was a circus.
All fall, the media speculated about when and how the Knicks and Stephon would part ways. Then the season started, and Stephon wasn't in the lineup or rotation; he wasn't a starter and he wasn't a contributor. Next, he was intermittently hurt, suspended, refusing to play, not used, and/or banished. He basically only played enough to fight with Eddie House and offer the timeless admonishment to "get caught up in life!" (Good advice.) And all along, the media speculated about when and how the Knicks and Stephon would break up.
Only they didn't. They traded jabs in the newspapers. They'd meet, they'd flirt with ending things, and then they wouldn't. It was just on to the next episode in the seemingly endless pussyfooting exercise. D'Antoni would assassinate Stephon's character; Stephon would say outlandish, provocative things; Donnie Walsh would be evasive and coy.
It became clear that Stephon wanted to start, and failing that, he wanted to get paid in accordance with his contract. Putting aside that Stephon is selfish and mischievous, and that he was corrosive as a Knick, his position was fair. If the Knicks didn't want to pay him, they shouldn't have traded for him. (Remembering Isiah Thomas's decisions is like having acid reflux disease of the mind. Gross.) And since they couldn't undo that, they should have traded him. Since they couldn't even do that, they had two choices: 1) cut him, pay him what was owed, and let him become another team's problem; 2) hold onto him, suspend him for insubordination, pay him.
This was an imperfect option set--a true dilemma--but it was appropriate for a franchise that has done everything wrong for the last decade. And in true Knicks fashion, they couldn't even get this right.
If you choose Option 1, you do that early on, so that you don't come off as petty and inept (which they have). You don't invite controversy and distraction by prolonging so much unpleasantness. If Option 1 was the plan, Stephon should not have been on the Knicks beyond 2008. They could have cut him in training camp, or, to be generous, once it became clear that he had no trade value. Option 1 is a financial hit, but nothing else, as the money is a sunk cost. It also severs all ties with the past and places the emphasis on
If you choose Option 2, you keep Stephon in team-imposed purgatory. You make a decisive announcement, and then you suspend him. If he files some kind of grievance, you activate him and then you let him rack up DNP-CD's all year. Or, you let him play with the scrubs. Anything short of starting isn't going to work for him, so it's not as though the method through which he is deployed (or not) makes a difference. Most important, though, you do not give him what he wants. You do not pay him and then let him go play for someone else, especially not a contender. Just as you are bound by the contract, so is he. He wants out? Well, he can either honor his signature or waive his rights. Again, the money is a sunk cost, so with Option 2, you take a financial hit and likely endure Stephon's antics, but you don't get sucked into a back-and-forth, you don't cave to his foolishness, and you don't help another team.
Two options. Simple. But simple and decisive is not how the Knicks do things. No. The Knicks go for complicated and messy. It's an institutional problem that runs with the Dolan family, I'd imagine. Not even someone like Walsh, who had no ties to the team or its ignominious recent history, could escape the regressive pull of Knick culture. So instead, the Knicks have chosen Option 3, the anti-Panglossian Worst of All Possible Worlds.
Under Option 3, the Knicks pay Stephon 90% of what he's owed; the affair gets stretched out as long as it can go, bringing with it as much embarrassing media coverage as possible; the Knicks buy out Stephon pretty much as late as they can while still leaving him eligible to join another team for the playoffs; Stephon joins a division foe that is among the two or three teams most likely to win a championship this year. Read all that again. ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
EPIC FAIL.
The Knicks, in effect, have chosen the worst possible solution. I mean, short of installing Stephon as NBA commissioner and making him eligible for the bailout funds we reserve for mismanaged banks, how could this have gone worse? The Knicks are paying Stephon almost $20 million for 65% of a season during which he actively hurt the team; the media coverage has been constant and embarrassing, casting the Knicks as--hello--inept; Stephon can and will join the Atlantic Division's Boston Celtics; and Stephon is now among the 24 players in the NBA most likely to win a title. What, the Knicks couldn't also get him to agree to administer anthrax to David Lee on the way out? They couldn't bargain away their cap space for the next 50 years? Why did they stop when they were doing so well at the bargaining table?
In effect, the Knicks decided that all of the tomfoolery and insanity, all of the wasted time and resources, the chance for Stephon to redeem himself with a title after behaving like a child--it was all worth $2m now and $2m in luxury tax savings. $4m to the Knicks is like 50 cents to Tiger Woods.
It's pathetic and disgusting. Maybe that's an overreaction, or a reaction encouraged by an irrational, visceral disdain for Steph. But as a Knicks fan who would like his favorite team to do one thing right for once, this feels like the latest betrayal. They couldn't even do this one thing. Unreal. And for what? FOR WHAT?
Only one situation properly captures the ridiculousness of this entire ordeal: the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. Like the disposition of Stephon, that has been protracted, mismanaged, embarrassing, expensive, and ultimately fruitless. Maybe this means that Barack Obama will replace James Dolan. I'd go for that.
Labels: Boston Celtics, Donnie Walsh, Isiah Thomas, Mike D'Antoni, NBA, New York Knicks, Politics, Stephon Marbury




















