Blog Bickering #6

Ah yes, Saturdays...
Heismanpundit, our sometime antagonist, is hosting the latest BlogPoll Roundtable. To the questions we go...
What criteria do you use to determine if a team and its players are good?
Everything you need to know about a team can be gleaned from watching how its defense aligns itself when the opponent has the ball inside the defense's twenty yard line. Are the corners playing inside technique? Are the linemen looking to go two-gap and stunt before limiting kick-out blocks and getting up-field with a swim move or a bull rush? Have the linebackers committed to--Ha! You thought I knew what I was talking about. Suckers.
Like most people in this world, I primarily assess a team using irrefutable statistics: won-loss records. Indiana might feature running backs who cradle the ball properly and defensive linemen who use their hands really well when engaged by blockers. However, all of that technique is worthless if it doesn't translate into scoring more points than the opponent does on a given Saturday. It's just like a student in a public speaking class who can make mince meat of a scantron but can't articulate an idea to save his or her life: It's nice to be good at something, but not if it's rendered irrelevant. And generally, I deem teams that win better than those that lose.
Once I've separated the winners from the losers, I try to analyze how the winning teams win by thinking about the schemes and trying to discern whether their methods are adaptable and sustainable. Adaptable meaning: A team has great receivers who exploit man coverage down the field because of their speed, but can they get open against a zone? And sustainable meaning: A team's running back gets fifty touches per game, but can that style work if he gets worn down? It's an inexact science. The Scarlet and Grey Prison Down South wins by feigning a real running game and hoping that it catches a defense single-covering Holmes and Ginn. Does the joke of a University have a real running threat if teams leave just six in the box? Can Ginn and Holmes beat double teams? Does it matter since the inmates are great defenders? I ask those sorts of questions, although when assessing Tennessee and the Minimum Security Prison and Home for the Mentally Challenged, I also have to factor in which key players might be thrown in the hole.
Like basketball, football is also a game that can hinge on [Corky Bowden] speciality [Corky Bowden] situations, and that's when I assess coaching. Does a team run a smart two-minute drill? Does it have plays that it knows will work in crunch time? Do the receivers run three-yard patterns on third down when they need eight? Is the team quitting in the middle of the game (like Michigan did in the season finale last year in Columbus)? Do the players seem mentally prepared? And, with a team that seems especially prone to wack coaching on the road, does it know how to fucking tackle a quarterback? Play like it actually has talent on the roster? Score in the red zone?
Whoa. I'm sorry. Give me a minute while I re-bottle the anger...
If you could choose one coach to build an offensive system for your team, who would it be? Conversely, who would you choose to devise the defense? Why?
Give me Jeff Tedford. Now that Norm Chow is gone and Michigan-QB-coach-and-one-day-head-coach Scott Loeffler is still without coordinator experience, I'll take Ted. Have you watched Cal? Aaron Rodgers threw for 2,566 yards and 24 TDs while completing 66-percent of his passes last season. Meanwhile, J.J. Arrington was gaining 2018 yards (!) on seven yards per carry. The backup RB, Marshawn Lynch, gained 628 yards on 71 carries. Are you kidding me? Almost 9 yards per carry? A combined 7.4? And this wasn't a one-year thing. Check the tapes; check the numbers. Tedford is an offensive genius, and the proof is his results. Not only have his players (especially quarterbacks like Dilfer, Carr, Smith, Harrington, Boller, and Rodgers) put up great numbers on their way to the NFL, but Cal has gone 7-5, 8-6, and 10-2 since he started coaching. Pete Carroll is a great college coach in full--recruiting, staffing, x'ing and o'ing, speaking to booster clubs, hanging out with Snoop--but Tedford might be even better. And he's certainly better at coaching 'em up on offense.
(This paragraph about defense will start once I have successfully fought off the urge to make fun of Jim Herrmann.)
Ok, I--nope...
The thing about defense is--not yet...
Tackli--psssh...
Ihatejimherrmannanddon'tunderstandwhyumcan'ttackleandstillcan'tstoprunningquarterbacks
OK, I'm ready. I'm staying in the Pac-10. Give me Carroll. These picks are the chalk ones, but they're chalk because they're consistently so good. Coming into this year, everyone is salivating over Leinart, Bush, Jarrett, White, Turner, et al., but overlooked is that USC was 5th in rushing defense, 44th in passing defense, 20th in scoring defense, and 6th in total defense last season. The passing number--about 200 yards per game--seems a little high, but not when you consider that USC was usually winning and regularly stuffing the run, meaning that other teams had to pass a lot. (That might be a specious argument built on a solid foundation of conventional wisdom.) USC defenders finish tackles, pursue plays, and get into the right position to make plays. They aren't caught going the wrong way, missing an angle, or letting a tackle get broken. They also don't have to blitz a lot because the front four have consistently generated a lot of pressure. A simple, effective scheme run by fundamentally sound players works for me.
Describe your typical college football Saturday.
(N.B: Given planned trips to watch the Michigans play this season, and, resultantly, planned posts about in-person game-day behavior, I'll describe what happens when I'm not at the game itself.)
At Straight Bangin', like HBO's Real Sports, nothing is out of bounds, and we take pride in fostering an environment in which everyone is comfortable. With that in mind, I'm gonna be honest and say something about which I am a little apprehensive, so please be supportive: On a given fall Saturday, there's a lot of cursing. I mean, enough profanity to get someone sent to the ninth level of hell. Like, a motherfucking shit-ton of the foulest fucking shit you've ever heard.
I get up in time to watch College Gameday. That's a given, like Ron Burgundy being a member of the Channel Four News Team. There might be some dancing and some chirping involved as the Bubba Sparxxxxxxxxx song plays out. (As friends and family will attest, I am what some might call an enthusiast.) There's also OCD-driven counting of how many clips we see of each school during the opening montage. Though this is an unpopular opinion, I fucking LOVE Lee Corso (), so when he comes on, I stark hollering things like "CORSO!" or "Warshington! Say Warshington" at the top of my lungs. Mind you, we're still just at 10:35. The neighbors have already called about three times.
As Gameday goes on, I start placing and fielding phone calls. I call the Jigga Man and try to get something recorded on his machine before my voice gives out in the crescendoing falsetto of excitement. Schoolpiece calls to ask if Corso really just said that. Stacey might rhetorically wonder on my voicemail if Herbstreit really is such a jerk. My father surely will get on the horn and tell me all about what Trev Alberts just said. Actually, simultaneous viewing of a sports program followed by an immediate debriefing phone call is S.O.P. for my father and I. Billy Packer is such scum! What is Lloyd doing? Mark May is picking Baylor to play Stanford in the Hall of Fame Game? By pick time--you know, when Corso consigns the team he's rooting for to sure failure--I have lost my voice, pissed off my neighbors, gone through three Michigan shirts, broken a sweat, and maxed out my cell phone battery. Yes, there has been drinking. Beer only. I don't fuck with the liquor.
When Gameday ends, the anxiety begins. If Michigan is playing at 3:30, then I'll make lunch, keep drinking, and channel surf my way through the early games, all while constantly afflicted by a miniscule tinge of doubt. I'll also get mad because Michigan being on at 3:30 means I'll probably have to DVR the CBS SEC Home Depot Tim Brando Sucks Game of the Week. Come game time, I am a wreck.
I have watched a lot of Michigan football games, and not once have I avoided feeling chills as the team jumps up and touches that M Club banner. Just writing these last two paragraphs has made me shiver. It's crazy and pathetic, but Michigan football is not just about the sport. It's also about 400,000+ people having a shared something to which they can attach all of the adoration they have for the University. Michigan is not a football school, and it's not just a university. It's the greatest school with the greatest team in all of sports, and people like me live and die with the team each Saturday not just because we want to score more points and feel good while we get wasted at The Brown Jug, but because we want to continue to feel connected to a wonderful experience.
Yuck. Enough with that genuine emotion. Now, about that profanity. Once the game starts, I am not street legal, and kids should be kept outside of a one-mile radius. From the moment the game kicks off, I am a football genius. I haven't ever made a bad play call, dropped a pass, missed a tackle, you name it. As a result, I expect the same of our coaches and players, and if they aren't meeting expectations, they hear about it. Three-yard run up the middle? Great, here comes that three-runs-and-a-punt offense. Fuck you, Lloyd. Pierre Woods misses a tackle? Well, he's a motherfucking douche bag. They scored?! You piece of shit cock suckers! Basically, I become Al Swearengen for three to four hours. I don't know if one bad play goes by without some kind of offensive language immediately behind it. Honestly, it's embarrassing, but I am just crazy. I'm learning to deal with it.
Good plays inspire elation, bad plays get the vitriol. By the end of the game, win or lose, I am exhausted. And there is drinking the whole time, much more when UM is losing. If I'm a glutton for misery, I might sign on to a Michigan message board and spend a few possessions posting a play-by-play account of my insanity. I can't believe that formation worked...Awesome call...NOOOOO!
If Michigan wins, I can go on with my life. Go out, make plans, go plans, make out, go outside for sun and air. If Michigan loses, well, it can get ugly. The drinking starts. Posting about imminent decline starts. The second-guessing persists for a year, if not longer. Talking to another human is out of the question. Staying awake is usually not likely, either. It's horrible. I'd rather not write about this.
I try to watch as much football as I can get away with. Sometimes, social life or familial obligations intrude, but otherwise, I'm watching my friends from ESPN, Michigan, someone else, and someone else, at least. I'm also rooting for Michigan, Spurrier, whichever teams need to win to help the Michigans, and whichever teams are respectively playing the prison team, Notre Dame, Nebraska, Texas, Tennessee, Penn State, Michigan State (once we've played them, because if they are already sucking, it's a sure L), Oklahoma, and Miami. One part of my routine that won't be an option any longer is listening to Mike Gottfried and Ron Franklin call a 7:45 game on ESPN. They got split up. I am NOT happy about this; they were a great tandem. I'll end a Saturday with Gamenight, SportsCenter, and Gamenight again.
Jesus, only three more days to endure!



























