Is it voyeuristic to watch the movie industry masturbate?Make sure to note the updates about
Cornel West/Little Brother and
Michigan Basketball if interested, but for everyone else, here's some other, varied reading:
-
As I noted the other day,
the conduct of the United States' intelligence agencies (this article is of paramount importance), specifically the C.I.A.,
is not only inhumane but probably illegal.
-
Jamie Foxx has come a long way since
The Players Club, huh? His come up and crossover augur well for
Kevin Hart. Riiiight.
This has to be the first time in a while that I have almost no interest in the Academy Awards. Yeah, there will be some hot women, my man, some nice clothing, and some funny jokes, but the 2004 crop of movies really didn't capture my attention. I thought that The Aviator was the best movie and that Don Cheadle was the best actor. If the former and the latter win their respective categories, I really won't have much to gripe about. Also, I stole this from Too Smart, but here's my take on the 2004 movies:
- What is with so-called adults liking Harry Potter movies so much? I admit to never having read the books (actually wanting to know things, I am compelled to read The New Yorker, The Economist, and books about real-life subjects, not some child-oriented, mystical boarding-school realm), so maybe "I just don't get it." But come on. I've seen these movies. They are entertaining, but they also have no edge and too many characters that work much better on the page than on the screen. One of the best aspects of the Lord of the Rings trilogy--a real man's book-to-movie adaptation--was that the characters, as presented, had tremendous depth. Some of that, of course, is because J.R.R. Tolkien could kick a J.K Rowling's ass all over the fantasy-literature universe in an Archangel Gabriel-battles-Satan kind of apocalyptic showdown (oh, the hallucinatory violence!). But some of it also owes to superior story telling from Peter Jackson. (And yes, the Rings movies are not without their flaws.) I acknowledge that Harry Potter movies target a different demographic than Lord of the Rings movies do, and that is fine, but adults need to stay in their lane. Besides, Potter wasn't even the best "kid's" movie of the year. Pixar's talented employees continue to provide the schematic for child-oriented movies that also resonate with adults
- When assessing House of Flying Daggers and Hero, and I think I preferred the latter, but it's close. (Quick side story: Some of the warm feelings I harbor for Hero stem from the fact that Andrew and I sat next to Laurence Fishburne in the theater when I saw it. Only in New York. And by the way, after laughing hysterically throughout the trailer for Taxi, Fishburne turned around to shout at his friend seated in the row behind ours, "Yo, I gotta see that!" How can such a smart, perspicacious actor have such deplorable taste?)
Are Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy so incredible in these Before movies that a fucking cult following has sprung up? There are so many people who have this cutesy adoration for these fucking movies. I'll take Jake Hoyt.
Here’s the real top-ten list:
10) Fahrenheit 9/11 - Specious arguments? Yes. Over the top? At times. But this was a movie that said important things about President Bush, the military, and America's general ignorance and apathy that are not honestly said often or loudly enough.
9) House of Flying Daggers - Visually stunning and far more intricate and layered than Hero. Sadly, the incoherence of the final thirty minutes marred this film and lent it an unintended, comedic this-is-obviously-a-foreign-film feel.
8) Collateral - Great performances. I loved Foxx, and I thought that playing a perhaps-psychotic villain suited Cruise, allowing his exaggerated acting and facial expressions to seem more natural than they usually do when he portrays characters--like Ethan Hunt or Nathan Algren--the audience is supposed to like. I often like Cruise movies in spite of him, but not this time. Also, Michael Mann did a wonderful job creating palpable senses of urgency and anxiety; this joint was smartly directed.
7) I *Heart* Huckabee's - This movie could have been better given the idea and the cast, and in some ways, it felt empty if one sought to dissect all of what was said. However, I found it to be subtly funny and emotionally accessible in an odd fashion. I'd like to watch it again so that I could further articulate why I enjoyed it so much.
6) Hero - This may have been one of the most beautiful movies I have ever watched. The use of color was dazzling and the story, though not especially enthralling, was still rousing. Isn't it sad that Jet Li's next movie features him wearing a dog collar the whole time? I think he's better than that, and I hadn't before seeing Hero.
5) The Incredibles - Only intended for children at the most superficial levels. On top of masterful animation, The Incredibles succeeded because the content was universal and the characters, though archetypical, were relevant and sweetly portrayed.
4) Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy - I can't explain this choice. I just worship Will Ferrell. His comedic audacity is hilarious, as is the way that he wields juxtaposition and irony. Anchorman was rewarding for the viewers who could tell that as Ron Burgundy was brought to life, Ferrell knew just how ridiculous the character and movie were. Being let in on the joke but now knowing where it's headed is so satisfying.
3) The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou - This was not Wes Anderson's best movie. Nor was it as funny as Rushmore or Royal Tenenbaums. However, it was still plenty funny, and the characters had a lot going on beneath the surface, making lame and obtuse the assertions that this was just a pastiche of the absurd and idiosyncratic. I thought that the sense of loneliness and the desire to feel connected, both experienced by so many of the characters, were affecting in the same way that they are when expressed in Edward Hopper's paintings.
2) Hotel Rwanda - This was not a triumph of imagination given that the film was based on a real-life tragedy. Instead, Don Cheadle gave a great performance, and Terry George communicated to a mass audience an atrocity that has been neglected and too easily forgotten. I had never cried while watching a movie before.
1) The Aviator - Howard Hughes was a fantastically fascinating fellow who was brought to life very well by Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio. The sets, the costumes, the cinematography--what a great movie! I could have watched three more hours of it.
Last four out (to borrow from the NCAA Tournament parlance):
1) Friday Night Lights - Derek Luke performed well, as did Billy Bob. This was especially touching for those who read the book.
2) Control Room - Obviously slanted, this movie still made a number of good points about the horrendous American media coverage of the Iraq "war."
3) Garden State - Much has been said. I liked watching it, despite the readily apparent flaws and from-a-certain-mold feel.
4) Kill Bill, Vol. II - I thought that Vol. I was better, but some of this film's shortcomings may be endemic of sequels.
Pleasantly Forgettable: Cellular (Maybe the worst trailer ever for a movie that wasn't nearly that bad); Bourne Supremacy; Starsky & Hutch (I love this out-of-nowhere Stiller/Ferrell/Wilson/Vaughn/Bateman(?) comedy nexus); Meet the Fockers (a pretty decent sequel); The Girl Next Door (I adore Cuthbert)
Most Disappointing:
10) Ocean’s 12
10) Troy
9) The Village
8) The Terminal
7) Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story
6) Napoleon Dynamite
5) The Ladykillers
4) The Woodsman
3) Team America: World Police
2) She Hate Me
1) Spider-Man 2
What were they thinking?!: Man on Fire; Catwoman; Van Helsing; The Day After Tomorrow; Envy; Soul Plane; Fat Albert; Jersey Girl
-
Six of diamonds captured! But don't worry,
the country is still a mess, and
the region just got less stable. Looks like
that meeting with Putin went
really, really good (video), er, well.
- Yes!
Just what I wanted to hear. Nothing will be better than losing in 2008, also. I will NOT vote for this lying, gutless woman in a primary.
- I just caught the my first glimpse of MTV's
My Super Sweet 16. It was some chick named
Ava's party . I only saw the last five minutes, but it was all I needed: That show is sickening. One day, someone will write a definitive book about MTV and its societal impact, and I hope that the thesis shows MTV as one of the most exploitative, condescending, smug cultural forces in history. How can so many people rejoice in seeing the bar set lower and lower? And don't get it twisted: I like me some MTV. I was all about
Yo!, I still like
Real World (although this
Philadelphia season has been terrible), and the music awards are always a spectacle.