Dead Man Walking

Maybe you could have punched a baby this morning to make the day complete.
For those keeping score at home, here are the numbers:
Last year, Michigan was 3-9 overall, 2-6 in the Big Ten. It beat Miami (OH) and Wisconsin at home, Minnesota on the road. It lost to Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan State, Notre Dame, Illinois, Utah, Purdue, Northwestern, and Toledo. Michigan missed a bowl game for the first time in 34 years, had its first losing season since 1967, and fielded the worst defense in program history (which, as of this season, is now 130 years long). It lost to a MAC school for the first time, it lost to Penn State for the first time in eleven years, and it lost to Ohio State for the fifth straight year.
This year, Michigan is 5-5, just 1-5 in the Big Ten. It started 4-0. The Wolverines have beaten Eastern Michigan, Western Michigan, Delaware State, Notre Dame, and Indiana at home. They've lost to Penn State and Purdue at home, Iowa, Michigan State, and Illinois on the road. The season's two remaining games--at Wisconsin and home against Ohio State--seem like sure losses. If I had to assign Michigan's probability of winning each game given how all three teams are playing and where the games will be held, I'd say Michigan's Wisconsin probability is something like 1/15 and Michigan's Ohio State probability is something like 1/25. That gives UM a 1/375 chance of finishing 7-5, and nothing better than a 3.3 percent chance of even becoming bowl eligible. Flipped over the other way, the Straight Bangin' Invented Metrics tell us that it is at least 96.7 percent probable that Michigan will endure its second straight losing season.
Some more numbers: Rich Rodriguez will likely close out the year with a lifetime Big Ten record of 3-13. He is now the first UM coach to lose at least five games in consecutive seasons. He will have put together the two worst scoring defenses ever. Illinois will have beaten UM in successive years for the first time in decades. Purdue will have won in Ann Arbor for the first time since the 1966. The only meaningful streak still intact will be UM's record for most games without being shutout. But who knows? Ohio State plays great defense, and the 2009 Wolverines now panic and make mistakes in the face of adversity. Rodriguez will be 0-2 against Ohio State, Illinois, Purdue, Michigan State, and Penn State; 0-1 against Iowa and Northwestern. His wins: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana.
2008 was a terrible season of change. A new coach with not merely a new system, but a new culture, had come from outside of the Michigan community to shake up something that had grown stale and far too self-reverential. Hard times were said to be the down payment required by a glorious future, so fans went along with it, by and large.
2009 was greeted with measured optimism. The roster's limitations were apparent to any objective observer, but plenty of schools had changed coaches and found their footing fairly soon after doing so. The best college football schools did so and then quickly won championships (Oklahoma, Ohio State, Florida). If nothing else, most people thought Michigan would be on its way to respectability, and then preeminence, by returning to a bowl, even if just at 6-6.
No one, though, expected this: a team to start 4-0 and then completely fall apart. No team that begins the year 4-0 should close it at 5-7. Especially not when the team that beat Notre Dame and was defined by its fortitude for a month and a half goes 1-2 against the three worst teams in the Big Ten (Indiana, Purdue, Illinois). What we are now witnessing is grotesque, because it bears the unnerving hallmarks of systemic failure. The 2009 team is not just a bad team; it might--might-- be the malignant growth spawned by a bad program.
For all of the balleyhooed tough talk about hard-ass country boy Rich Rodriguez and his toughness consigliere, Mike Barwis, the sad truth is that for two years, now, Rodriguez's teams have wilted when faced with adversity. He does the same, as West Virginia may have proved against Pittsburgh two years ago. Last year, this weakness was explained away by assigning blame to ill-fitted players, players used to the Lloyd Carr School of Enlightened Football for Gentle Poetry Fans. But this year? After two winters of Rodriguez workouts? After 21 months of the new regime that isn't so new anymore? Hard to find much solace in the old excuses as any signs of progress have been replaced by the same old problems. Most alarming among them is the team's tendency toward hysterical ineptitude. Something goes wrong, Rodriguez yells, and the team either quits or collectively chooses to emulate Mike Williams. Mike Williams being, of course, the Michigan safety who unquestionably enjoys the ignominy of being the worst starter on any BCS-conference team. (Nick Sheridan won this award last year, so that's one streak Rodriguez has seized, not ruined.)
As this is a post primarily concerned with numbers, I'd like to address the sum of these circumstances rather than exploring them at greater length. (Though his team with no poise that plays bad football wouldn't offer a qualitative shelter.) Anyone who has watched Michigan this year has seen its regression and the proppogation of bad football. But step back and think: Rich Rodriguez has suddenly crossed over into unchartered dark territory. By the numbers, he is the worst coach in Michigan's illustrious history. College football, of course, is a game of numbers, in some ways. Most wins, most Heismans, most years, yada yada yada. College football is into counting.
Count up the Rodriguez era in Ann Arbor and these numbers net out in a negative total. For an outsider like Rodriguez, who is already besieged by a misguided whisper campaign among a faction of loyalist "Michigan Men" who think Mike DeBord is how you spell "success," the numbers are going to be fatal. Unless he wins big next year--at least 9-3 with a New Year's Day bowl game, a win over MSU, and maybe a win over OSU--he won't weather the storm he's helped to amplify. Bill Martin will leave, old-timer David Brandon will arrive, and Rodriguez will be sitting in an office adorned by no trophies, awards, or markers of positive distinction. No, he will be the man who rather than helping old grandpappy Michigan look rejuvenated and venerable instead took him for a tour of cemetary plots. And the numbers will tell the story, because they are ugly and unlikely to get much better.
What has this coaching staff shown at Michigan that would make anyone believe it can engineer a significant improvement next season? In 2010, Michigan goes to Happy Valley, Columbus, and South Bend. It will return a bulk of its offense, but it also will return its entire defense, save for first-round-pick Brandon Graham. Can a 5-7 team get to 9-3? Not this team, and not with these coaches. Not when two years in, the bad special teams and dumb turnovers and horrible game management add up to something ugly.
Using a results-based approach, someone could make a case for Rodriguez to be fired on November 22 if Michigan ends the year as expected. The numbers would do the talking, and they'd say that Rich Rod is a bad fit at UM who might not be equipped to succeed under the unique weight that the job carries with it. The politics, the tradition, the varied stakeholders--it might be too much for Rich. And, to be frank, he's only made worse many of the macro-level issues--like growing irrelevance--that festered under Lloyd Carr.
I don't subscribe to this, mostly for practical reasons. First, Rodriguez's track record at literally every other school argues for another year of patience. Second, firing this coach is impractical and imprudent: he's owed too much money, the position would be viewed as toxic by qualified outsiders, and the instability would do more harm than another bad or middling season under Rodriguez. However, this is measured restraint, because, as noted, nothing that has happened for almost two seasons suggests that Michigan got what it thought it was buying when it spent so much for Rodriguez. After another damning loss and another embarrassment for a program which needed no more of either, Rich Rod is back to square one: show and prove. He has fairly made a bed in which he now must lie and endure questions about his competency and doubts about his methods. Everything he does, fairly or not, will be treated as a referendum on his future. That's what happens with you lose to Illinois and Purdue for two straight years.
I suspect that it's already too late for him, though. There will be no glory for him in Ann Arbor. There will be no beautiful miscegenation of college football royalty with from-bottom radicalism. There will be no Golden Era of Spread for Michigan football and Coach Rod. Instead, those numbers will stare back at him and everyone important until the searing gaze burns him up. Everytime Rodriguez is assessed, these horrible numbers from 2008 and 2009 will tell a sad, offensive story.
The Rich Rodriguez Era at Michigan will be over before it ever really begins.
Labels: College Football, Michigan, Rich Rodriguez








